Skip to main content

Find and evaluate grants

Choose catalog, profile, project, or award research

Pick the research path that fits your question, give matching tools useful inputs, and verify every shortlist against official sources.

Synthetic GrantPro match-by-project page with a fictitious, non-confidential project description.
Match by project ranks catalog opportunities from a concise project description; its results still require official-source review.
View full-size screenshot

Choose the path for the question

The four research paths answer different questions. None is an eligibility decision or a substitute for the current official notice.

  1. Use Catalog when you already know a topic, agency, amount, deadline, or status you want to filter.
  2. Use Match by profile when you want a scored list based on saved organization type, project categories, and funding range.
  3. Use Match by project when you can describe one project and want an AI-assisted relevance ranking of current catalog opportunities.
  4. Use Awarded Grants to study historical awards by keyword, agency, state, or amount; an award record is not an open opportunity.
  • Start with one path, save promising opportunities, and compare them later in Saved Grants.
  • A high match score measures the tool's ranking signals, not agency approval, eligibility, or funding likelihood.

Give matching tools useful, safe inputs

Better inputs make a shortlist easier to review. Match by project's AI-assisted ranking may process the project description together with relevant saved organization facts, so use only information the organization authorizes for that purpose.

  1. Confirm the organization type and location in the profile before using Match by profile or Match by project.
  2. Describe one project with the community or population, place, intended outcome, major activity, and approximate funding need.
  3. Keep the description concise and non-confidential. Do not paste names of individuals, private client facts, credentials, unpublished partner details, or a full application narrative.
  4. Review the match reasons and any missing-requirement warnings before opening a result.
  • Describe the work, not promotional claims such as best, guaranteed, or certain to win.
  • Run a separate match for a materially different project instead of combining unrelated activities.

Recover from weak or empty results

A short or empty shortlist can reflect narrow inputs, incomplete catalog fields, or a temporary matching error. It does not prove that no relevant funding exists.

  1. For profile matching, check the saved organization type, category, and funding range, then broaden only one choice at a time.
  2. For project matching, shorten the description to one need, place, population, and outcome; remove jargon and try once more.
  3. If Match by project reports an error, continue with Catalog filters instead of repeatedly submitting the same description.
  4. Open every promising result, verify its opportunity number and current status, and read the official notice before acting.
  • Do not change true organization facts merely to obtain a different ranking.
  • Historical award patterns can inspire research, but they do not establish a current agency priority or available solicitation.

Questions? Visit the Help Center | Contact Support